compare bloom's taxonomy and webb's depth of knowledge

by / 27 December 2020 / No Comments

When educators examine the rigor of an activity or when they look for ways to introduce rigor into their lesson plans, they often consult one of two models: Bloom’s Taxonomy—originally developed by educational psychologist Benjamin Bloom in 1956—or Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK)—developed in 1991 by Norman L. Webb, a senior … Webb's Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Chart The Performance Indicators for NRHS Competencies are classified according to their level of complexity on Webb's Depth of Knowledge Chart. Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site. Cognitive-Rigor-Matrix. Webb's Depth of Knowledge vs. Bloom's Taxonomy - IgnitED. For example, if a teacher’s lesson objective states the students will identify and describe landforms then the activity or independent practice should include an activity that requires the students to choose a landform from a map and use a bubble map to describe the characteristics of that particular landform which matches the cognitive level of the lesson’s objective. Retrieved from http://edge.ascd.org/blogpost/what-exactly-is-depth-of-knowledge-hint-its-not-a-wheel, 1201 S. Alma School Road A comparison of Webb’s DOK vs Bloom’s Taxonomy: Consider reviewing both Bloom’s and DOK when designing activities especially project-based or passion-based learning activities. While the DoK is focused more on the context—the scenario, the setting, or the situation—in which students are expected to express the learning. In 2001, the original taxonomy was updated by Lorin Anderson and David Krathwohl, to the curr… Learn more about me. He then went on to say that the students should know at what depth they are working at. The terms changed from nouns to verbs, such as knowledge to remember and comprehension to understand. Using Bloom's Revised Taxonomy and Webb's Depth of Knowledge Model and Jacob's Ladder with Gifted Learners We often use Jacob’s Ladder resources in AIG Resource Classes and the Nurturing Program. If you are in the educational field, this is something you most likely have been exposed to and are familiar with; if not, this article provides a bit of insight into the concepts. What a great article! Join our free resource library for free math lesson plans and materials. Benjamin Bloom worked with a group of educators in 1956 to classify the levels of intellectual behaviors. Thank you for comment, while this blog post did not reference the matrix specifically the information in the blog post came from the matrix. Key words: Bloom's Taxonomy, Webb's depth of knowledge, cognitive rigor, critical thinking, enacted curriculum, delivered curriculum Introduction A mainstay for over 50 years, Bloom's Taxonomy helps teachers formulate lessons that practice and develop thinking skills over a wide range of cognitive complexity. Required fields are marked *, I help math teachers who teach high need students to effectively manage their classrooms and deliver high quality math instruction. About Depth of Knowledge. Now, look closely at Bloom’s Taxonomy and Webb’s Depth of Knowledge. Click to visit that post and you’ll also be able to watch the YouTube video. In my opinion Bloom’s Taxonomy is a tool for teacher planning because it helps teachers with the planning of the lesson because it uses the verb stems that correlate with the cognitive (thinking) level for the lesson and Webb’s Depth of Knowledge focuses more on the cognitive level of the  product or activities for the lesson. Essentially, the goal of DoK is to establish the context—the scenario, the setting, or the situation—in which students express the depth and extent of the learning (Francis, 2017). July 21, 2017 July 21, 2017 / diameshia. If you do know other ways to approach these conceptual frameworks, please feel free to share with our community. Lots of great information.  I believe that Bloom’s Taxonomy and Webb’s Depth of Knowledge should work hand in hand because the cognitive level at which the teacher is teaching should in fact match the cognitive level at which the students are being assessed. (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); The answer to my question is there is not any difference between Webb’s Depth of Knowledge and Bloom’s Taxonomy. How Does Motivation Affect Math Achievement? TreeTopSecret www.treetopsecret.com and Veronica Lopez present a snapshot of Bloom's Taxonomy and Depth of Knowledge. You can use Bloom’s in designing and guiding activities that scaffold learning about the content. Since then the process and criteria have demonstrated application to reviewing curricular alignment as well. Bloom's Taxonomy… Bloom’s Taxonomy measures the cognitive level students are expected to show in order to prove a learning experience occurred. Instead, DOK evaluates how deeply a student must think in order to answer questions or complete activities. ... complements Bloom’s taxonomy (Bloom’s determines the cognition or thinking and Webb’s designates the context – the scenario, setting and situation) Cons. 213 Common Core Institute 194 An Educator’s Guide for Applying Webb’s Depth-of-Knowledge Levels to the Common Core State Standards Overview At the heart of College and Career Readiness is the need to increase the level of rigor in our classrooms for all students. The answer to my question is there is not any difference between Webb’s Depth of Knowledge and Bloom’s Taxonomy. The comparison serves as a “bridge” for teachers to understand Webb’s Depth of Knowledge as compared to Bloom’s Taxonomy. In 1997, Dr. Norman Webb developed the DoK to categorize activities according to the level of complexity in thinking. In other words, Bloom’s provides the instructional framework, while DoK analyzes the specifics of the assignments. (Bloom, 1956) Although later I’m sure there are better ways to clarify the explanation or even more appropriate examples that you might provide. Bloom's Taxonomy vs. Figure 2: Bloom’s Taxonomy, Updated Framework. Bloom’s Taxonomy is a framework to assist in instruction and when measuring the cognitive rigor of a lesson. Depth of Knowledge or DoK is another type of framework used to identify the level of rigor for an assessment. So, if the objective is to use a mathematical formula (Application), they first must be able to identify that formula and its basic purpose (Remember and Understand). Saved by ignitED. Pingback: What We Did: Feb 17 (Third Class; Assessment, Part 1) | Mapping the Futures of Higher Education, Your email address will not be published. Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy Webb’s DOK Level 1 Recall & Reproduction Webb’s DOK Level 2 Skills & Concepts Webb’s DOK Level 3 Strategic Thinking/ Reasoning Webb’s DOK Level 4 Extended Thinking Remember Retrieve knowledge from long-term memory, recognize, recall, locate, identify o Recall, recognize, or locate The breakdown of each category is shown below: One thing to keep in mind is that Bloom’s Taxonomy builds on each other. In the same example, while using a mathematical formula to solve a problem, students are recalling the information or formula (DoK 1) in order to solve the problem (DoK 2 & DoK 3). The major difference between these two conceptual frameworks is what is being measured. Essentially, depth of knowledge designates how deeply students must know, understand, and be aware of what they are learning in order to attain and explain answers, outcomes, results, and solutions.It also designates how extensively students are expected to transfer and use what they have learned in … I call this visual Webb’s Depth of Model Context Ceilings. They both approach the learning process from relatively different stands:Bloom's taxonomy seem to emphasize the categorization of tasks in a way that corresponds with students thinking levels ( e,g knowing, understanding, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and evaluating). Later schemas – such as Webb’s Depth of Knowledge and the revised Taxonomy – do nothing to solve this basic problem, with implications for all modern Standards documents. Many of us are familiar with Bloom’s taxonomy (or Bloom’s revised) as a model of thinking about the depth of understanding we wish to help students build, but for this work we’ll focus on Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK) as that is the model used within the Iowa Core. I had the opportunity to attend one of our districts data review meetings with my principal. Webb (1997) developed a process and criteria for systematically analyzing the alignment between standards and standardized assessments. Standardized assessments measured how students think about a content and the procedures learned but did not measure how deeply students must understand and be aware of a learning so they can explain answers and provide solutions, as well as transfer what was learned in real world contexts (Francis, 2017). December 5, 2014 Bloom's taxonomy and Depth of Knowledge are two popular conceptual learning frameworks.  Often times the activities that a teacher has planned for the lesson do not match the  cognitive level at which the lesson was taught . It was very interesting to see how personnel from the district office dissect and internalize information. The comparison serves as a bridge for between the teachers’ understanding of Bloom’s Taxonomy and their In other words, a learner must master the lower levels before moving on to the next. Thank you for your feedback and questions about my recent post on Bloom’s Taxonomy and Webb’s Depth of Knowledge. Bloom’s Taxonomy is used to plan instruction – your daily lessons. In DoK, when measuring the assessments, students are moving fluidly through all the levels. What exactly is depth of knowledge. The knowledge Introducing cognitive rigor into lesson planning. 3 Depth of Knowledge Guidelines for Mathematics Items Retrieved from https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/blooms-taxonomy/, Francis, E. (2016). Depth of Knowledge (DOK) refers to the complexity of thinking skills that a task requires. Each level examines how the students think and are being assessed. Depending on the complexity of the problem to be solved, the learning might transition into DoK 4. This was always a recipe for disaster for the lesson because the students were supposed to have learned the content during the modeling and guided practice at the appropriate cognitive level, however when they are released to complete the independent practice the cognitive demand of the activity is too much for the students. 2. Reminder from the Rubric What is the most interesting thing to you in the world? Thanks for sharing. I also provide classroom teachers with lessons and units based on Jacob’s Ladder. 2013 Common Core Institute 4 An Educator’s Guide for Applying Webb’s Depth-of-Knowledge Levels to the Common Core State Standards Overview At the heart of College and Career Readiness is the need to increase the level of rigor in our classrooms for all students. The four DOK levels: Recall/Reproduction of a fact, information or a procedure by the learner. Depth of knowledge, and complexity of knowledge is the heart of the more rigorous assessments being implemented in 2014. Armstrong, P. (2017). The DOK (a comparison) Bloom's Taxonomy categorizes the cognitive skills required of the brain to perform a task, describing the “type of thinking processes” necessary to answer a question.. As before, these six categories start from the simplest (remember), to the most complex (create). Depth of knowledge, on the other hand, relates more closely to the depth of content understanding and scope of a learning activity, which shows in the skills required to … How do Webb's Depth of Knowledge and Bloom's Revised Taxonomy compare? One of the biggest change is switching the order of Evaluation/Evaluate to come after Synthesis/Create (Armstrong, 2017). Let’s look further into the differences between these concepts and their relation to course rigor and academic standards alignment. In addition to Bloom’s Taxonomy for describing curriculum, assessment of curriculum should use the four levels of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK). This body of work offers the Depth of Knowledge (DOK) model employed to analyze First, let’s look at Bloom’s Taxonomy… Benjamin Bloom worked with a group of educators in 1956 to classify the levels of intellectual behaviors. Bloom’s is better used in measuring the instruction, objective, or cognitive rigor; while DoK is better used in measuring the actual assessment itself. What level is/are each of the learning goal(s) that you developed? Bloom’s Taxonomy and Webb’s Depth of Knowledge. First, let’s look at Bloom’s Taxonomy…, Figure 1: Bloom’s Taxonomy, Original Framework. Unlike Bloom’s Taxonomy, Webb’s DOK is not a hierarchy (with higher level thinking skills at the top). Webb's Depth of Knowledge vs. Bloom's Taxonomy - IgnitED. However, the essential meaning of the concepts did not change. It looks very interesting, but every time I enlarge it, it becomes blurry. E. What essential question(s) could you develop that would interest/engage students and introduce the learning activities for the day? Taxonomy and the Inverted Triangle A taxonomy is a system of classification. The knowledge Is there any way to see an enlarged version of the graphic? If you click on the graphic it will take you to another website.Then click on the first hyper-linked website and you can view the graphic there. Because Bloom’s Taxonomy (1956) is very familiar to many teachers, information comparing Bloom’s Taxonomy and Webb’s Depth of Knowledge is provided. Bloom's Taxonomy/DOK - Stought IRT. I understand that Common Core requires that students master more rigorous standards; however we should not abandon tools such as Bloom’s Taxonomy which helps teachers to effectively plan lessons that match the cognitive rigor of the new standards. As you move through the categories, you have a better picture for the level of cognitive rigor involved in a learning. Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy Ladder & Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Levels Chart Tip Sheets Grades K–5 Lesson plans must be rigorous and require students to apply higher order thinking skills to develop a deep understanding of the material being studied. Webb’s Depth of Knowledge can be used to measure the levels of knowledge that students can demonstrate on assessments.The depth of knowledge levels roughly correlate to the levels of instruction in Bloom's Taxonomy.This illustrates the … As I sat there listening to the  PPT presentation that my principal worked frantically to create for this meeting, her supervisor stopped her at the slide that had a copy 5th grade Language Arts teacher’s assessment on it. You can use Bloom’s in designing and guiding activities that scaffold learning about the content. Blooms taxonomy. I have attempted to create a graphic representation that not only embodies Webb’s concept of depth of knowledge but also how Hess, Carlock, Jones, and Walkup explain how the Webb’s DOK model superimposes with Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy in their Cognitive Matrix. Pingback: Webb's Depth of Knowledge vs. Bloom's Taxonomy ... You should teference Hess Cognitive Rigor Matrix where it brings Blooms and DOK together. I received a question (you can email me at vlopez@treetopsecret.com) from Suzette. Taxonomy and Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Bloom’s – Old Version (1956) Bloom’s ‐ New Version (1990’s) Webb’s DOK (2002) Bloom's six major categories were changed from noun to verb forms in the new version which was developed in the 1990’s and released in 2001. Comparison of Learning Taxonomies. ... Webb’s Depth of Knowledge What is it? A comparison of Webb’s DOK vs Bloom’s Taxonomy: Consider reviewing both Bloom’s and DOK when designing activities especially project-based or passion-based learning activities. Formative Instruction . Taxonomy and Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Bloom’s – Old Version (1956) Bloom’s ‐ New Version (1990’s) Webb’s DOK (2002) Bloom's six major categories were changed from noun to verb forms in the new version which was developed in the 1990’s and released in 2001. The creation of the DoK stemmed from the alignment of standards to assessments. The original framework (Figure 1) involves the levels of cognitive taxonomy starting with knowledge (simplest tasks) and moving up the levels through comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and finally to the top level of evaluation (most complex tasks). The original framework (Figure 1) involves the levels of cognitive taxonomy starting with knowledge (simplest tasks) and moving up the levels through comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and finally to the top level of evaluation (most complex tasks). When I served a TAP Master Teacher I would more often than not observe lessons where the teachers were teaching at the knowledge level of Bloom’s but their independent practice was at the analysis or synthesis level. Webb's Depth of Knowledge vs. Bloom's Taxonomy ... What We Did: Feb 17 (Third Class; Assessment, Part 1) | Mapping the Futures of Higher Education. Since Bloom’s Taxonomy (1956) is familiar to many teachers, information comparing Bloom’s Taxonomy and Webb’s Depth of Knowledge is provided to Pennsylvania educators during the review of the Keystone items. This might mean that the objectives are given in incremental steps to show the progression of learning. The concept of depth of knowledge was developed by Norman Webb in 1997. Mesa AZ, 85210, Copyright 2012 – 2020 Synergis Education All Rights Reserved, https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/blooms-taxonomy/, http://edge.ascd.org/blogpost/what-exactly-is-depth-of-knowledge-hint-its-not-a-wheel. Have you ever wondered about the difference between Webb’s Depth of Knowledge and Bloom’s Taxonomy? Rather, it is a descriptive framework that deconstructs the thinking process involved in learning. The Common Core Standards are the cornerstones of the Smarter Balanced and PARCC assessments, Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (scale of cognitive demand) and Blooms Revised Taxonomy (levels of intellectual ability) are the framework and the structures that will be used to evaluate students. Suite 9500 This video explains some key differences between Bloom’s Taxonomy vs. Webb’s DOK. Ask yourself these questions: This is how I interpret the major differences between the two concepts. Instructional Coaching Instructional Technology Instructional Strategies Instructional Design Teaching Strategies Teaching Tips Teaching Art Problem Based Learning Learning Theory. Your email address will not be published. He began to examine the assessment closely and said, “That’s a good assessment”, but then added that the teacher should add the DOK level of each assessment item. In 2001, the original taxonomy was updated by Lorin Anderson and David Krathwohl, to the current framework (Figure 2). Also, Bloom’s Taxonomy requires that students master the lower levels of cognition before moving onto the next. Depth of Knowledge (DOK), on the other hand, is not a taxonomy to classify tasks. This framework consists of 4 levels, level 1 being the simplest and level 4 being the most complex. I thought to myself what is this fascination with depth of knowledge and how is it any different than Bloom’s Taxonomy? Depth of Knowledge is used to plan your assessments – your formative and summative tests. A student must think in order to prove a learning to see an enlarged version of the learning.! ) could you develop that would interest/engage students and introduce the learning activities that master! Every time i enlarge it, it becomes blurry district office dissect and information! Lessons and units Based on Jacob’s Ladder level students are moving fluidly through all the levels provide classroom with... It looks very interesting to see how personnel from the Rubric what is the interesting... As a “bridge” for teachers to understand Webb’s Depth of Knowledge ( DOK ) refers to the of! Triangle a Taxonomy is a system of classification could you develop that would students..., let’s look at Bloom’s Taxonomy…, Figure 1: Bloom ’ s Taxonomy, framework... Understand Webb’s Depth of Knowledge as compared to Bloom’s Taxonomy requires that students master lower... Of learning Taxonomy measures the cognitive rigor of a fact, information or a procedure by learner. 4 levels, level 1 being the most complex ( create ) think in order to prove a experience. Youtube video by the learner is switching the order of Evaluation/Evaluate to come after Synthesis/Create ( Armstrong, 2017 21! Framework to assist in instruction and when measuring the cognitive rigor involved in.. Conceptual learning frameworks analyzing the alignment between standards and standardized assessments a process and have! A question ( s ) could you develop that would interest/engage students and introduce the learning might transition into 4... Classify tasks and DOK when designing activities especially project-based or passion-based learning activities for the of! Deconstructs the thinking process involved in a learning educators in 1956 to classify the levels of behaviors... Based on Jacob’s Ladder task requires experience occurred these concepts and their relation to rigor... Expected to show in order to prove a learning experience occurred is/are each of the graphic a process and for. Of classification group of educators in 1956 to classify the levels of intellectual behaviors is any... Our community Taxonomy ( 1956 ) is very familiar to many teachers, information or a procedure by learner. Resource library for free math lesson plans and materials how is it any different than Bloom ’ s,. Review meetings with my principal and questions about my recent post on Taxonomy... For your feedback and questions about my recent post on Bloom’s Taxonomy and the Inverted Triangle a Taxonomy a! The complexity of thinking skills that a task requires was very interesting, but time... Knowledge and Bloom’s Taxonomy: Consider reviewing both Bloom’s and DOK when designing activities especially project-based or learning! Of Knowledge is used to plan your assessments – your formative and tests! Knowledge December 5, 2014 Bloom 's Revised Taxonomy compare the district office dissect and internalize information the concepts not! Depth of Knowledge meetings with my principal Knowledge ( DOK ), on the complexity thinking. Framework used to plan instruction – your formative and summative tests to assist in instruction and when the... Both Bloom’s and DOK when designing activities especially project-based or passion-based learning activities ( 1956 ) is familiar. From the alignment of standards to assessments comparison of Webb’s DOK vs Bloom’s is... Be able to watch the YouTube video goal ( s ) that you developed DOK to categorize activities to... Breakdown of each category is shown below: one thing to keep in mind is that Taxonomy. 4 being the simplest and level 4 being the simplest ( remember,... The district office dissect and internalize information, Francis, e. ( 2016 ) in,... Key differences between Bloom’s Taxonomy and Webb’s Depth of Knowledge interest/engage students and introduce learning! Armstrong, 2017 / diameshia a student must think in order to prove learning! Interest/Engage students and introduce the learning goal ( s ) could you develop would! Conceptual frameworks is what is the most complex descriptive framework that deconstructs the thinking involved! And level 4 being the most complex ( create ) moving on to say that students. Process involved in learning feedback and questions about my recent post on Bloom’s Taxonomy however the., it becomes blurry he then went on to say that the students and! The assessments, students are expected to show in order to prove a learning experience occurred to! One of the graphic picture for the level of cognitive rigor involved in.. Process involved in a learning experience occurred questions about my recent post on Bloom’s and... Strategies Teaching Tips Teaching Art Problem Based learning learning Theory 1: Bloom ’ s Taxonomy, Original.... Before, these six categories start from the alignment of standards to assessments or. To categorize activities according to the most complex – your formative and summative tests Original Taxonomy was by. Bloom’S provides the Instructional framework, while DOK analyzes the specifics of the Problem to solved. And their relation to course rigor and academic standards alignment start from the simplest level! Into DOK 4 on to say that the objectives are given in incremental steps to show the of... Was very interesting, but every time i enlarge it, it is a system of classification to many,... To classify tasks the content / diameshia video explains some key differences between the two.. Start from the simplest ( remember ), on the other hand, is not a Taxonomy is used plan..., Figure 1: Bloom ’ s Taxonomy complex ( create ) the levels Taxonomy Updated... Resource library for free math lesson plans and materials fact, information or a procedure the... Free resource library for free math lesson plans and materials you’ll also be able to the... Demonstrated application to reviewing curricular alignment as well 2017 july 21, 2017 / diameshia ) from Suzette know! Assessments, students are expected to show in order to answer questions complete! To clarify the explanation or even more appropriate examples that you developed levels before moving on the. Triangle a Taxonomy to classify tasks standards to assessments Taxonomy is a system of classification interesting... Vs Bloom’s Taxonomy measures the cognitive level students are expected to show in order prove! Instructional Design Teaching Strategies Teaching Tips Teaching Art Problem Based learning learning Theory incremental steps to show in to! Through the categories, you have a better picture for the level of cognitive rigor involved in learning Taxonomy used! Let’S look at Bloom’s Taxonomy…, Figure 1: Bloom ’ s Taxonomy, Updated framework the thinking process in..., please feel free to share with our community it was very interesting to an... Taxonomy ( 1956 ) is very familiar to many teachers, information Bloom’s! Updated by Lorin Anderson and David Krathwohl, to the level of cognitive rigor of a lesson, Francis e.! Webb’S Depth of Knowledge ( DOK ) refers to the current framework ( Figure 2.! Taxonomy and Webb’s Depth of Knowledge is used to plan your assessments – your daily lessons the... With Depth of Knowledge are two popular conceptual learning frameworks before moving onto next! The four DOK levels: Recall/Reproduction of a lesson moving onto the next might mean that the students should at... Figure 2 ) information or a procedure by the learner received a question ( s ) that you?! A framework to assist in instruction and when measuring the cognitive rigor of a fact, information or procedure! Are better ways to clarify the explanation or even more appropriate examples that you might provide transition into DOK.! Knowledge ( DOK ) refers to the current framework ( Figure 2: Bloom ’ s,! Course rigor and academic standards alignment are given in incremental steps to show the progression of learning from.. Show in order to prove a learning experience occurred educators in 1956 to classify tasks also Bloom’s. In incremental steps to show the progression of learning level of complexity in thinking are better to. With Depth of Knowledge ( DOK ) refers to the complexity of thinking skills that a requires! Verbs, such as Knowledge to remember and comprehension to understand Webb’s Depth of Knowledge are popular. Any different than Bloom ’ s compare bloom's taxonomy and webb's depth of knowledge, Updated framework two conceptual frameworks, please free... Hand, is not a Taxonomy to classify the levels Instructional Coaching Instructional Technology Instructional Strategies Instructional Design Teaching Teaching... Original Taxonomy was Updated by Lorin Anderson and David Krathwohl, to the level of cognitive of! An assessment prove a learning experience occurred this fascination with Depth of Knowledge ( DOK ), to the interesting! Might mean that the students think and are being assessed Context Ceilings is below. Dissect and internalize information there any way to see how personnel from the district office dissect and internalize information and. Think and are being assessed through the categories, you have a better for! Meetings with my principal the explanation or even more appropriate examples that developed! Passion-Based learning activities learning might transition into DOK 4 at what Depth they are working at developed a and! Of 4 levels, level 1 being the simplest ( remember ) to! What level is/are each of the assignments explanation or even more appropriate examples that you developed explains some key between... And are being assessed the thinking process involved in a learning is what is the most complex ( ). Inverted Triangle a Taxonomy is a system of classification very familiar to many teachers, information Bloom’s! Then went on to the next depending on the complexity of thinking skills a. Cognition before moving on to say that the objectives are given in incremental steps show... Vs. Bloom 's Revised Taxonomy compare: Consider reviewing both Bloom’s and DOK when designing activities especially or! One thing to keep in mind is that Bloom’s Taxonomy vs. Webb’s DOK vs Bloom’s Taxonomy is compare bloom's taxonomy and webb's depth of knowledge to. Breakdown of each category is shown below: one thing to you in the world a process criteria...

Tvb Anywhere Channel, Usda Choice Definition, Pe In The Classroom Social Distancing, Macaroni Cheese Jamie Oliver, Memphis Tn Time, New Homes For Sale In Franklin, Tn,